User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.1/27.2213; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 320X240 Pantech TXT8045085
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechTXT8045085 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Brew PantechTXT8045085smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1closeBREW PantechTXT8045085closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119Brew PantechTXT8045085mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:15 | by ThaDafinser