User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.4; YPY_07FTA Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Safari/537.31 OPR/14.0.1074.57768
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PositivoYPY_07FTA Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1074.57768closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 14.0.1074.57768closeAndroid 2.3.4GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 14.0Presto Android 2.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1074.57768closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 14.0.1074closeAndroid 2.3.4PositivoYPY_07FTAcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 14.0.1074.57768WebKit 537.31Android 2.3.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 14.0Webkit 537.31Android 2.3.4PositivoYPY 07FTAtabletyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1074.57768closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 14closeAndroid 2.3Tabletyesyescloseclose0.07101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:15 | by ThaDafinser