User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; xx; LG-E805 Build/JDQ39B) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.2 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
Android Browser Android 4.2.2Webkit 534.30LGOptimus G2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.2WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.27503 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LGE805smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LGE805closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.2WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2LGLGE805closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2LGOptimus G2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:15 | by ThaDafinser