User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I8330-Vodafone/I8330BUJF8 Opera/9.8 (SLP; Linux/SLP/R1; U; en) Presto/2.4.21 Version/10.00 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8330-Vodafone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeLinux Vodafone360 H2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.8Presto GNU/Linux SamsungGT-I8330smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.8closeLinux SamsungGT-I8330-Vodafonecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.31503 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.21Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.21Linux Vodafone360 H2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:15 | by ThaDafinser