User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1200.0 Iron/21.0.1200.0 Safari/537.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-114.php
Iron 21.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iron 21.0WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.12501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 21.0.1200.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Iron 21.0.1200.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iron 21.0WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 21.0.1200.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iron 21.0.1200closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iron 21.0.1200.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SRWare Iron 21.0.1200.0WebKit 537.1Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iron 21.0Webkit 537.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 21.0.1200.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:14 | by ThaDafinser