User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-KF310/V09c Browser/Obigo-Q05A/3.12 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKF310 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGKF310mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKF310smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGKF310closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGKF310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A LGKF310mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-KF310closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGKF310Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:14 | by ThaDafinser