User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4; Trident/8.0; rv:550) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Safari/550.1.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
IE 12.0Win10 6.48.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 12.0Trident 8.0Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 550closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 7.0closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.32003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 7.0WebKit Windows 10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 7.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 550closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.16002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 7.0WebKit 8.0Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 550Trident 8.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 550closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:14 | by ThaDafinser