User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 (x86_64)) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/36.0.1985.125 Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chromium 36.0.1985.125Ubuntu Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 36.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 36.0.1985.125closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 36.0Blink Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 36.0.1985closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 36.0.1985.125WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 36.0.1985.125Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:14 | by ThaDafinser