User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/5.0; SlimBrowser)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-other.yaml
SlimBrowser Windows 8Trident 5.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 9.0Trident 5.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SlimBrowser closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.21002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident Windows 8desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SlimBrowser closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SlimBrowser Trident 5.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SlimBrowser Trident 5.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:13 | by ThaDafinser