User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.65 Safari/537.36 OPR/26.0.1656.32
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 26.0Windows 7Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 26.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 26.0.1656.32closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 26.0.1656.32closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 26.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 26.0.1656.32closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 26.0.1656closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.65closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 26.0.1656.32WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 26.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 26.0.1656.32closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 26.0.1632.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:13 | by ThaDafinser