User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) MxNitro/1.0.1.3000 Chrome/35.0.1849.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-667.php
Maxthon Nitro 1.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon Nitro 1.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1849closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Nitro 1.0.1Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:13 | by ThaDafinser