User agent detail

OneBrowser/4.2.0/Adr(Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; ADR6325 Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
ONE Browser 4.2.0Android 2.3.4WebKit HTCADR6325smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 4.2WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 4.2.0closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCMergemobile-browseryescloseclose0.28403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 4.2WebKit Android 2.3HTCADR6325smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4ADR6325closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 4.2.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 4.2.0Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTCMergemobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3HTCADR6325Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.12001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:13 | by ThaDafinser