User agent detail

LG-LG410/V10b[TF011804005705266004525013042038847] Teleca/WAP2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG410 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG410 V10bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo WAP 2.0close LGLG410mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LG410smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LG410closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGLG410closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGLG410mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGLG-LG410GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:12 | by ThaDafinser