User agent detail

WindowsMobile7.http.HTC-7 Mozart-2250.09.12505.111-0004
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTC7 Mozart-2250.09.12505.111-0004 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
WindowsMobile7 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows Mobile HTC7 Mozart-2250.09.12505.111-0004mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows HTC7smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Mobile HTC7 Mozart-2250.09.12505.111-0004closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows HTC 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows Mobile HTC7 Mozart-2250.09.12505.111-0004mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:11 | by ThaDafinser