User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; MS840 4G Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
Chrome 29Android 4.1.2Blink 537.36LGConnect 4Gmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.1.2MS840 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.72WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.1.2LGConnect 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:11 | by ThaDafinser