User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; ja-JP-mac; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
UNKNOWN Mac OSX 10.5 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.0Gecko MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.11801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.0.14closeOS X 10.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.0Gecko Mac 10.5desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.0.14closeOS X 10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.0.14closeMac OS X 10.5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.0.14closeOS X 10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.0.14Gecko 20110420Mac OS X 10.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.0.14Gecko 1.9.1Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:11 | by ThaDafinser