User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; Series60/5.2 Nokia600/111.010.0004; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) NokiaBrowser/7.4.1.1 Mobile Safari/533.4 3gpp-gba
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia600 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser 7.4WebKit SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.4WebKit Symbian^3 BelleNokia600smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 111.010.0004;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.4.1closeSymbian^3 Belle Nokia600closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser 7.4.1.1WebKit 533.4NokiaOS NokiaNokia 600closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser 7.4.1Webkit 533.4Series60 5.2Nokia600mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:11 | by ThaDafinser