User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; VS810PP Build/KOT49I.VS810PP1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
Chrome 35Android 4.4.2Blink 537.36LGTranspyremobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2LGVS810PPmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.4smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2LGVS810PPcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.4.2LGTranspyremobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.4LGVS810PPSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:11 | by ThaDafinser