User agent detail

SIE-C66/34 UP.Browser/7.0.0.1.c.3 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensC66 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-C66 34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.c.3close SiemensC66mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 SiemensC66smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.0close SiemensC66closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.0.1.c.3 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.0 SiemensC66mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SiemensC66Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:10 | by ThaDafinser