User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; lworld spider 1.0; Windows NT 5.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
lworld spider 1.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.0Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyeslworld spiderclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.0 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:10 | by ThaDafinser