User agent detail

Opera/9.27
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-751.php
Opera 9.27unknown unknown2.0 unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.27Presto 2.0 Desktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.27close desktop-browsercloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.27Presto 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.27close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.27close closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.27close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.27 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.27 desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.27closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:09 | by ThaDafinser