User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; de-at; HTC_One_S_pj40200/1.11.169.132 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne S pj40200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0HTCOne SMobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCPJ401mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0HTCOne S pj40200smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCOne S pj40200closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.3HTC One Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3HTCOne Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0HTCPJ401Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.11301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:09 | by ThaDafinser