User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 3.2; ViewPad 10S Build/HTJ85B) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Safari/537.31 OPR/14.0.1074.58201
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ViewsonicViewPad 10S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.19102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1074.58201closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 14.0.1074.58201closeAndroid 3.2GenericAndroid 3.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 14.0Presto Android 3.2ViewSonicViewPad 10Stabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1074.58201closeAndroid 3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 14.0.1074closeAndroid 3.2ViewsonicViewPad 10Scloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 14.0.1074.58201WebKit 537.31Android 3.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 14.0Webkit 537.31Android 3.2ViewSonicViewPad 10stabletyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1074.58201closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.07301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:08 | by ThaDafinser