User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; Avant Browser; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-184.php
Avant 0.0WinXP 5.14.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avant Trident 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Avant Browser closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Avant Browser Trident Windows XPdesktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Avant 1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Avant Browser closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Avant Browser Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:08 | by ThaDafinser