User agent detail

UNTRUSTED/1.0/HS-T39_TD/1.0 Release/03.03.2011 Threadx/4.0 Mocor/W10 Browser/NF4.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Config/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
NetFront 4.0ThreadX 4.0 HisenseHS-T39smartphoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UNTRUSTED 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.0closeThreadX 4.0HisenseT39mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ThreadX 4.0HisenseHS-T39smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.0 ThreadX 4.0HisenseT39mobile:featureyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:08 | by ThaDafinser