User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SPHM550 NETFRONT/351 MMP/20 PROFILE/MIDP-21 CONFIGURATION/CLDC-11 UNTRUSTED/10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSPHM550 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SPHM550 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 351closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 351NetFront SamsungSPHM550smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSPHM550closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SamsungSPHM550 NETFRONTmobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:07 | by ThaDafinser