User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; HTC_DesireHD_Beats_X315e; de-de) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.34 Safari/534.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesireHD Beats X315e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit GNU/Linux HTCDesireHD Beats X315esmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeLinux HTCDesireHD Beats X315ecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34WebKit 534.24Linux HTC Desire HD Beatscloseclosecloseclosecloseclose1.0011 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Linux HTCDesireHD Beats X315emobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:07 | by ThaDafinser