User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; Go.Web/6.5; HandHTTP 1.1; Elaine/1.0; RIM957 )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GenericSmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Go.Web 6.5closeBlackBerry OS RIM957mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
RIMBlackBerry 957smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Go.Web 6.5 BlackBerry OS RIM957mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:06 | by ThaDafinser