User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PowerPC AmigaOS 4.1; Odyssey Web Browser; rv:1.16) AppleWebKit/535.14 (KHTML, like Gecko) OWB/1.16 Safari/535.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Odyssey 1.16AmigaOS 4.1Webkit 535.14desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 535.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.14closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Odyssey Web Browser 1.16WebKit AmigaOS 4.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeAmigaOS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 535.14Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Odyssey 1.16Webkit 535.14AmigaOS 4.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:06 | by ThaDafinser