User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100923 Caixa Magica Linux/1.9.2.10-0.1xcm15 (15) Firefox/3.6.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.18202 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.10,gzip(gfecloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.10Gecko 20100923Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.10Gecko 1.9.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:06 | by ThaDafinser