User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; Gentoo Linux; xx) Presto/2.10.289 Version/12.02
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Opera 12.02Gentoo Presto 2.10.289desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.02Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.02closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.02Presto Gentoo desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.02closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.2closeGentoo closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.02closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.2Presto 2.10.289Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.02Presto 2.10.289Gentoo desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.02closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:05 | by ThaDafinser