User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5380E/1.0 Bada/2.0 Dolfin/2.0 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-bada.yaml
Dolfin 2.0Bada 2.0 SamsungWave Ymobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5380E 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeBada 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit Bada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Esmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Ecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0 Bada 2.0SamsungWave Ymobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:05 | by ThaDafinser