User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36 Seznam.cz/1.2.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-705.php
Seznam Browser 1.2Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Seznam Browser 1.2Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:05 | by ThaDafinser