User agent detail

MOT-V171 UP.Browser/6.2.2.7 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV171 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V171 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.2.7close MotorolaV171mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 MotorolaV171smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.2close MotorolaV171closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.2.2.7 MotorolaMotorola V171closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 MotorolaV171 UPmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaV171Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:04 | by ThaDafinser