User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0) AddSugarSpiderBot www.idealobserver.com
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
AddSugarSpiderBot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAddSugarSpiderBotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesAddSugarSpiderBotCrawler0.137 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:04 | by ThaDafinser