User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.120 Safari/535.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 15Windows VistaWebkit 535.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 15.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 15.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 15.0.874closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 15.0.874.120WebKit 535.2Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.445 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 15Webkit 535.2Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 15.0.874.120closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:04 | by ThaDafinser