User agent detail

MOT-V80/0E.03.0EI MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV80 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV80Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V80 0E.03.0EIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close MotorolaV80mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaV80smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV80closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V80closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV80mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaV80Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:04 | by ThaDafinser