User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/537.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.1+ LG Browser/6.00.00(+3D; LGE; Media/BP740; 5037; abc;); LG NetCast.Media-2013 /5037 (LG, Media/BP740, wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LG Browser 6.00 Webkit 537.1LGBP740 NetCast Media 2013television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 537.1closeLinux LGBP740closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.106 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 6.00Webkit 537.1 LGBP740 NetCast Media 2013televisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:03 | by ThaDafinser