User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; En-US; GT-I8520 Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, Like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.3.324 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8520 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.10201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324closeAndroid 2.1-update1GenericAndroid 2.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.257 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 2.1SamsungGALAXY Beamsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.3closeAndroid 2.1.0SamsungGT-I8520closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1-update1closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.3.324WebKit 534.31Android 2.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 2.0SamsungGalaxy Beammobile:smartyescloseclose0.04201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:03 | by ThaDafinser