User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; ar-iq; EVO3D_X515m Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCEVO3D X515m Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0HTCEVO 3DMobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCX515mobile-browseryescloseclose0.335 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0HTCEVO3D X515msmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCEVO3D X515mcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3HTCEVO 3Dmobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0HTCX515Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:03 | by ThaDafinser