User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Fedora/16 (NRCBBXGu8kHISSSeydKmMptKvoa0gMvZ1htgTp2WpNQ=) Chromium/21.0.1180.81 Chrome/21.0.1180.81 Safari/535.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 21.0.1180.81Fedora Webkit 535.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 21.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.14901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.81closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 21.0.1180.81closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 21.0WebKit Fedora 16desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.81closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 21.0.1180closeFedora closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 21.0.1180.81closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 21.0.1180.81WebKit 535.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 21.0.1180.81Webkit 535.2Fedora desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 21.0.1180.81closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 21.0.1180.83closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:02 | by ThaDafinser