User agent detail

Mozilla/4.08 (N902i;FOMA;c300;TB;W24H12)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoN902i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close NECN902imobile-browseryescloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoN902icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.438 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NECN902imobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N902icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close PanasonicP904iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:01 | by ThaDafinser