User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad3,1; iPad; U; CPU OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X; en_GB) com.google.GooglePlus/29676 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/J1AP (gzip)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-138.php
Google+ App 0.0iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Google+ App WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Google Plus iOS 7.0AppleiPad 3tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.0.4closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0.4closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPad3,1closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeiPhone OS 7.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 iOS 7.0.4AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google+ iOS 7.0.4AppleiPad (3rd gen)tabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0.3closeiOS 7.0.3AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:00 | by ThaDafinser