User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Slackware Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.44 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.31 (Edition beta)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Opera Beta 25.0Slackware Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 25.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.09501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1614.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 25.0.1614.31closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Slackware desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1614.31closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1614closeSlackware closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.44closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1614.31WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Beta 25.0Blink Slackware desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1614.31closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:00 | by ThaDafinser