User agent detail

samsung-GT-I8550/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/4.2.2 Release/07.13.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I8550 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-GT-I8550 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Winmobile-browseryescloseclose0.281 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY Winsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-I8550closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Winmobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.11001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:00 | by ThaDafinser