User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Vagabondo/2.3; webcrawler at wise-guys dot nl; http://webagent.wise-guys.nl/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Vagabondo 2.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesVagabondoBot/Crawler0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesVagabondoclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesVagabondoCrawler0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:59 | by ThaDafinser