User agent detail

Nokia1680c
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia1680c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia1680c closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Nokia1680cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia1680csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia1680ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 1680ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia1680cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia1680 classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.10101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:59 | by ThaDafinser