User agent detail

Safari/6534.59.8 CFNetwork/454.12.4 Darwin/10.8.0 (i386) (Macmini1%2C1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Safari 4.0MacOSX 10.6unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 4.0WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6534.59.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.6.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.6desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 454.12.4closeMac OS X 10.6.8AppleMacmini1,1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Mac OS X 10.6.8desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
CFNetwork App closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:59 | by ThaDafinser