User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD) AppleWebKit/538.15+ Midori/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Midori 0.5NetBSD Webkit 538.15desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.5closeNetBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.5WebKit NetBSD desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.5closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.5closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.5WebKit 538.15a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.5Webkit 538.15NetBSD desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:58 | by ThaDafinser