User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo B6000-H Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-711.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoYoga 8 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoYoga 8 3GTabletyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.253 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoIdeaTab B6000-Htabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoB6000-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.15 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoB6000 Yoga Tablet 8tabletyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.4LenovoLenovo B6000-HTabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:58 | by ThaDafinser